Pengaruh Informasi Real-Time pada Kecepatan Keputusan Stratejik dan Konsensus di Lingkungan High Velocity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61769/telematika.v8i2.77Keywords:
Kecepatan keputusan stratejik, Informasi real-time, Konsensus, Industri high velocity, Dukungan pada keputusanAbstract
Kecepatan keputusan stratejik dan konsensus telah diidentifikasi sebagai faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan [5, 38]. Sesuai dengan perspektif parallel information processing model [15], penelitian kualitatif [20] menunjukkan bahwa informasi real-time membantu eksekutif di industri high velocity mengambil keputusan stratejik dengan cepat. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkonfirmasi temuan-temuan tersebut, dalam konteks yang baru di Indonesia, serta untuk memahami apakah kecepatan keputusan dan konsensus dapat dicapai secara bersamaan. Studi ini melibatkan 156 responden yang merupakan manajemen puncak di industri telekomunikasi, media, dan IT di Indonesia. Hasil kuantitatif empirik menunjukkan bahwa informasi real-time meningkatkan kecepatan keputusan, konsensus, dan dukungan pada keputusan. Lebih penting lagi, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kecepatan keputusan dan konsensus dapat dicapai secara bersamaan, dan keduanya akan meningkatkan dukungan para anggota tim manajemen puncak (TMP) terhadap keputusan stratejik yang diambil.
Strategic decision speed and consensus have been previosly identified as determinants of firm performance [5, 38]. In line with the parallel information processing model [15], [20] showed that real-time information helps executives in high velocity industry make fast strategic decisions. This research was conducted to confirm those findings, within a new context in Indonesia, and whether decision speed and consensus can be achieved simultaneously. It involved 156 respondents who belong to the top management within the telecommunication, IT, and media sectors in Indonesia. The quantitative empirical evidence shows that real-time information has positive effects on strategic decision speed, consensus, and support for the decision. More importantly, this study demonstrates that decision speed and consensus can be achieved simultaneously and both will improve support for the strategic decision by members of the top management team (TMT).
References
Abebe, M. Top Team Composition and Corporate Turnaround Under Environmental Stability and Turbulence. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 3(31), 196-212, 2010.
Adidam,P.T.; dan Bingi, R.P. The Importance of Decision Confidence to Strategy Outcomes. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 16(2), 35-50, 2000.
Alavi, M. An Assessment of the Concept of Decision Support Systems as Viewed by Senior-Level Executives. MIS Quarterly, 6(4), 1 -9, 1982.
Bandura, A. Self efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, 191 -215, 1977.
Baum, J.R.; dan Wally, S.; Strategic Decision Speed and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11): 1107-1129, 2003.
Bavelas, A. Communication Patterns in Task Oriented Groups. Pada D. Lerner dan H. Lasswell (Eds.). The Policy Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1951 .
Bergeron, F.; Louis R.; dan Martin L. Top Managers Evaluate the Attributes of EIS. Pada I. Zigurs (Ed.). DSS-91 Transactions, 6-14, 1991.
Bingi, R.P.; dan Kasper, G.M. Good Decisions Are Not Enough: The Relationship Between Decision Confidence and Implementation. Working Paper, 1999.
Bourgeois, L.J. Performance and Consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1(3), 227-248, 1980.
Bourgeois, L.J.; dan J. Singh. Organization Slack and Political Behavior within Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Proceedings, 43-47, 1983.
Bowman, C.; dan Ambrosini, V. Perceptions of Strategic Priorities, Consensus and Firm Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34: 241–258, 1997.
Bryson, J.M.; dan Bromiley, P. Critical Factors Affecting the Planning Implementation of Major Projects. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 319-337, 1993.
Chin, W.W. Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22,1 , 1998.
Citroen, C.L. The Role of Information in Strategic Decision-Making. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 493-501, 2011 .
Corner, P.D.; Kinicki, A.J.; dan Keats, B.W. Integrating Organizational and Individual Information Processing Perspectives on Choice. Organization Science, 5(3), 294-308, 1994.
Dess, G.G.; dan Origer, N.K. Environment, Structure, and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conceptual Integration. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 313-330, 1987.
Dooley R.S.; Fryxell, G.E.; dan Judge, W.Q. Belaboring the Not-So Obvious: Consensus, Commitment, and Strategy Implementation Speed and Success. Journal of Management, 26 (6), 1237-1257, 2000.
Dooley, R.S.; dan Fryxell, G.E. Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 389-402, 1999.
Dutton, J.E.; dan Jackson, S. Discerning Threats and Opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370-387, 1988.
Eisenhardt, K.M. Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High velocity Environments. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 543-576, 1989.
Eisenhardt, K.M. Speed and Strategic Choice: How Managers Accelerate Decision Making. California Management Review, 32(3), 39-54, 1990.
Eom, S.B.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, E.B.; dan Somarajan, C. A Survey of Support System Applications (1988-1994). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(2), 109-120, 1998.
Fredrickson, J.W.; dan Iaquinto, A.L. Inertia and Creeping Rationality in Strategic Decision Processes. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543-576, 1989.
Fullan, M. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press, 1991.
Guth, W.; dan MacMillan, I.C. Strategy Implementation Versus Middle Management Self-Interest. Strategic management Journal, 7, 313-327, 1986.
Hage, J. Theories of Organizations: Form, Process and Transformation. New York: Wiley, 1980.
Hambrick, D.C.; dan Mason, P.A. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206, 1984.
Hayes, J. The Complete Problem Solvers. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press, 1981.
Hickson, D.J. Decision Making at the Top of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 165-192, 1987.
Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (2nd Ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
Huber, G. A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making. Academy of Management Review, 15, 47-71 , 1990.
Igbaria, M.; Zinatelli, N.; Cragg, P.; dan Cavaye, A.L,M. Personal Computing Acceptable Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly, September, 279-299, 1997.
Janis, I.L. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of ForeignPolicy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1972.
Jones, J.W.; dan and McLeod, Jr., R. The Structure of Executive Information Systems: An Exploratory Analysis. Decision Sciences, 17, 220-248, 1986.
Judge, W.Q.; dan Miller, A. Antecedents and Outcomes of Decision Speed in Different Environmental Contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 449-463, 1991 .
Karube, M.; Numagami, T.; dan Kato, T. Exploring Organisational Deterioration: Organisational Deadweight as a Cause of Malfunction of Strategic Initiatives in Japanese Firms. Long Range Planning, 42(4), 518-544, 2009.
Keegan, W.J. Multinational Scanning: A Study of the Information Sources Utilized by Headquarters Executives in Multinational Companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 411-421 , 1974.
Kellermanns, F.W.; Walter, J.; Floyd, S.W.; Lechner, C.; dan Shaw, J.C. To Agree or Not to Agree? A Meta-analytical Review of Strategic Consensus and Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 126-133, 2011 .
Knight, D.; Pearce, C.L.; Smith, K.G.; Olian, J.D.; Sims, H.P.; Smith, K.A.; dan Flood, P. Top Management Team Diversity, Group Process, and Strategic Consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 445-465, 1999.
Kreitner, R. Management, 8th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001.
Kreitner, R.; dan Kinicki, A. Organizational Behavior. 7th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
Leavitt, H.J. Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50, 1951.
Leidner, D.E.; dan Elam, J.J. The Impact of Executive Information Systems on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making. Organization Science, 6(6), 645-664, 1995.
Leidner, E.; dan Elam, J.J. Executive Information Systems: Their Impact on Executive Decision Making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(3), 139-156, 1994.
March, J.; dan Olsen, J. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.
Mason, R.O.; dan Mitroff, I.I Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: Wiley, 1981.
Menon, A.; Bahardwaj, S.G.; dan Howell, R. The Quality and Effectiveness of Marketing Strategy: Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict in Intraorganizational Relationships. Business and Economics Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 299-313, 1996.
Menon, A.; Bharadwaj, S.; Adidam, P.T.; dan Edison, S.W. Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making: A Model and a Test. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 18-40, 1999.
Mintzberg, H.A. Organizational Power and Goals: a Skeletal Theory. Pada D.E. Schendel dan C. Hofer (Eds). Strategic Management. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 64-80, 1979.
Mintzberg, H.A.; Raisinghani, D.; dan Theoret, A. The Structure of Unstructured Decision Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31,365-388, 1976.
Mowday, R.T.; Steers, R.M. dan Porter, L.W. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247, 1979.
Naranjo-Gil, D. Management Information Systems and Strategic Performances: The Role of Top Team Composition. International Journal of Information Management, 20(2), 104-110, 2009.
Parayitam, S.; Olson, B.J.; dan Bao, Y. Task Conflict, Relationship Conflict and Agreement-Seeking Behavior in Chinese Top Management Teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(1), 94-116, 2010.
Pavlou, E.S. The Third Hand: IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities. Journal Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-471 , 2010.
Perlow, L.A.; Okhyusen, G.A.; dan Repenning, N.P. The Speed Trap: Exploring the Relationship between Decision Making and Temporal Context. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 931 -955, 2002.
Potter, J.A.; Minutolo, M.; dan Lipinski, J. Key Factors for Shortening Response Time in the Strategic Issues Diagnosis Process. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 12(1), 69-87, 2010.
Priem, R.L. Top Management Team Group Factors, Consensus, and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 469-478, 1990.
Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; dan Will, S. SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. Hamburg. [On-line]. Available: http://www.smartpls.de.2005.
Roberto, M.A. Strategic Decision-Making Processes: Beyond the Efficiency-Consensus Trade-Off. Group & Organization Management, 29(6), 625-658, 2004.
Russo, J.E.; dan Shoemaker, P.J.H. Managing Overconfidence. Sloan Management Review, 33(2), 1992.
Schweiger, D.; Sandberg, W.R.; dan Rechner, P. Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inqluiry, Devils Advocacy, and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 4, 1989.
Schweiger, D.M.; dan Sandberg, W.R. The Team Approach to Making Strategic Decisions. Pada H. G. Glass (Ed.). Handbook of Business Strategy. Boston: Warren, Gorham dan Lamont, 1 -20, 1991.
Simon, H. Making Management Decisions: The Role of Intuition and Emotion. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 57-64, 1987.
Sniezek, J.A. Groups Under Uncertainty: An Examination of Confidence in Group Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124-155, 1992.
Sniezek, J.A.; dan Henry, R. Accuracy and Confidence in Group Judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 1 -28, 1989.
Talaulicar, T.; Grundei, J.; dan V. Werder, A. Strategic Decision Making in Start-Ups: The Effect of Top Management Team Organization and Processes on Speed and Comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 519-541, 2005.
Tenenhaus M.; Amato S.; dan Vinzi, E.V. A Global Goodness-of-fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modeling. Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Vol. Contributed Papers, CLEUP, Padova, 739-742, 2004.
Venkatraman, N.; dan Ramanujam, V. Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence. Journal of Management, 13(1), 109-122, 1987.
Vila, J.; dan Canales, J.I. Can Strategic Planning Make Strategy More Relevant and Build Commitment Over Time? The Case of RACC. Long Range Planning, 41,273-290, 2008.
Vroom, V.; dan Yetton, P. (1973). Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wooldridge, B.; dan Floyd, S.W. Strategic Process Effects on Consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 295-302, 1990.
Zhang, M.J. Can Firms Improve their Bottom-line Performance from Providing Information Systems Support for Strategic Decision Making? The Business Review, 15(1), 2010.
Stanat, R. Building a Document-Based Competitive Intelligence System. Pada J. Fedorowicz (Ed.). DSS-86 Transactions: 6th International Conference on Decision Support Systems April 21-24, 1986. Washington, D.C., 60-64, 1986.
Applegate, L.M. Lockheed-Georgia Company: Executive Information Systems. Harvard Case (9-187-147), Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 1987.
Muir, B.M. Trust between Human and Machines, and the Design of Decision Aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(May), 527-539, 1987.
Thomas, J.B.; dan McDaniel.,Jr.,R.R. Interpreting Strategic Issues: Effects of Strategy and the Information-Processing Structure of Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 286-306, 1990.
Stevenson, H.; dan Gumpert, D. The Heart of Entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 85-94, 1985.
Lawler, E.E. (1973). Motivation in work Organizations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks dan Cole, 1973.
Riggs, M.L.; dan Knight, P.A. The Impact of Perceived Group Success-Failure on Motivational Beliefs and Attitudes: a Causal Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 755-766, 1994.
Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. The effects of framing and negotiation overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 34-49, 1985.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
