Kecepatan dan Konsensus dalam Keputusan Stratejik di Lingkungan High Velocity: Sebuah Studi Literatur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61769/telematika.v8i1.96Abstract
Konsensus dan kecepatan keputusan stratejik adalah dua keluaran proses keputusan yang menjadi konstruk penting dalam proses strategi karena berpengaruh pada kinerja perusahaan (Rajagopalan, Rasheed, dan Datta 1993) terutama di lingkungan high velocity (Eishenhardt, 1989). Studi literatur ini dilakukan dengan cara mengidentifikasi penelitian-penelitian terdahulu menyangkut kedua konstruk tersebut untuk memahami pengaruhnya pada kinerja perusahaan dan anteseden-anteseden dari keduanya. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa 1) baik kecepatan keputusan stratejik maupun konsensus pada umumnya meningkatkan kinerja, dan 2) anteseden keduanya dapat berada pada tingkat individu, tim manajemen puncak, proses, organisasi, dan industri. Penelitian selanjutnya dapat dilakukan secara empirik untuk memahami apakah keduanya dapat dicapai secara bersamaan oleh manajemen puncak sehingga meningkatkan keberhasilan eskekusi strategi (Dooley, Fryxell, dan Judge, 2000), dan kinerja perusahaan secara keseluruhan, terutama di lingkungan high velocity.
Consensus and strategic decision making speed are two decision process outcomes that are important in the field of strategy process because their influence on a firm’s performance (Rajagopalan, Rasheed, and Datta 1993), especially in high velocity environment (Eisenhardt, 1989). This literature review was conducted by identifying previous studies on both constructs in order to gain insights on their consequences on firm performance as well as their antecedents. Results show that 1) both strategic decision speed and consensus generally improve firm performance, and 2) their antecedents can be related to individual, top management team, process, organization, or industry factors. Further research can be done empirically in order to build understanding on whether both constructs can be achieved simultaneously by top management team such that the success of strategy execution (Dooley, Fryxell, and Judge, 2000) and the firm’s overall performance can be improved especially in high velocity environment
References
Ackoff, R.L. (1974). Redesigning the Future. New York: Wiley.
Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.
Amason, A.C. (1996). Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving A Paradox for Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Andrews, K.R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Ansoff, H.I. (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw Hill.
Argouslidis, P.C. (2008). Determinants of the Speed of Elimination Decision Making in Financial Services. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(3), 237-254.
Baum, J.R.; dan Wally, S.; (2003). Strategic Decision Speed and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11): 1107-1129.
Bourgeois, L.J. (1980). Performance and Consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1(3), 227-248.
Bourgeois, L.J. (1985). Strategic Goals, Perceived Uncertainty, and Economic Performance in Volatile Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 548-573.
Bourgeois, L.J.; dan Eisenhardt, K. (1988). Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry. Management Science, 34, 816-835.
Bourgeois, L.J.; dan J. Singh. (1983). Organization Slack and Political Behavior Within Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Proceedings, 43-47.
Bowman, C.; dan Ambrosini, V. (1997). Perceptions of Strategic Priorities, Consensus and Firm Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34: 241–258.
Braybrooke, D.; dan Lindblom, C.E. (1970). A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press.
Brodwin, D.R.; dan Bourgeois, L.J. (1984). Five Steps to Strategic Action. Pada G. Carroll dan D. Vogel (Eds.). Strategy and organization: A West Coast perspective. 167-181. Boston: Pitman.
Browne, G.J.; Curley, S.P.; dan Benson, P.G. (1997). Evoking Information in Probability Assessment: Knowledge Maps and Reasoning-Based Directed Questions. Management Science. 43, 1–14.
Carpenter, M. A.; dan Sanders, W.G. (2009). Strategic Management: A Dynamic Perspective. Concepts and Cases, 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. [17] Chen, M.; dan Hambrick, D.C. (1995). Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ from Large Firms in Competitive Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 453-482.
Child, J. (1972). Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22.
Cosier, R.A. (1982). Methods for Improving the Strategic Decision: Dialectic Versus the Devil’s Advocate. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 373 - 374.
Cyert, R.M.; dan March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
Dean, J.W.; dan Sharfman, M.P. (1996). Does Decision Process Matter? A Study of Strategic Decision-Making Effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 368–396.
Dess, G.G. (1987). Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a Fragmented Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3), 259-277.
Dess, G.G.; dan Keats, B.W. (1987). Environmental Assessment and Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Field Study. Academy of Management Proceedings, 21-25.
Dess, G.G.; dan Origer, N.K. (1987). Environment, Structure, and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conceptual Integration. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 313-330.
DeWoot, P.; Heyvaert, H.; dan Martou, F. (1977-1978). Strategic Management: an Empirical Study of 168 Belgian. Firms. International Studies of Management and Organization, 7, Winter 1977-78, 60-75.
Dooley R.S.; dan Fryxell, G.E. (2002). Top Management Team Heterogeneity, Consensus, and Collaboration: A Moderated Mediation Model of Decision Quality. Academy of Management Proceedings & Membership Directory, L1-L6.
Dooley R.S.; Fryxell, G.E.; dan Judge, W.Q. (2000). Belaboring the Not-So-Obvious: Consensus, Commitment, and Strategy Implementation Speed and Success. Journal of Management, 26 (6), 1237-1257.
Dooley, R.S.; dan Fryxell, G.E. (1999). Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 389-402.
Duncan, R.B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313 – 327.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High velocity Environments. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 543-576.
Eisenhardt, K.M.; dan Schoonhoven, C.B. (1990). Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth Among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504-529.
Eisenhardt, K.M.; dan Zbaracki, M.J. (1992). Strategic Decision Making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, Special Issue: Fundamental Themes in Strategy Process Research, 17-37.
Emery, F.E.; dan Trist, E.L. (1965). The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21 – 32.
Erffmeyer; dan Lane (1984). Quality and Acceptance of an Evaluative Task: The Effects of Four Group Decision-Making Formats. Group & Organization Studies 9,4.
Finkelstein, S.; dan Hambrick, D.C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Pub. Co
Forbes, D.P. (2001). The Performance Implications of Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence From a New Venture Context. Presented at 2001 Academy of Management Meeting, Washington, DC.
Forbes, D.P. (2005). Managerial Determinants of Decision Speed in New Ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 355-366.
Fredrickson, J.W. (1984). The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 445-466.
Fredrickson, J.W. (1985). Effects of Decision Motive and Organizational Performance Level on Strategic Decision Processes. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 821–843.
Fredrickson, J.W.; dan Mitchell, T.R. (1984). Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 399-423.
Gero, A. (1985). Conflict Avoidance in Consensual Decision Processes. Small Group Behavior, 16(4), 487-499.
Ghemmawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy. New York: Free Press.
González-Benito. J.; Aguinis, H.; Boyd , dan Suárez-González, I. (2007). Coming to Consensus on Strategic Consensus: A Mediated Moderation Model of Consensus and Performance. Presented at the 2007 meetings of The Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
Grinyer, P.; dan Norburn, D. (1975). Planning for Existing Markets: Perceptions of Executives. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 138(1), 70-97.
Grinyer, P.; dan Norburn, D. (1977/78). Planning for Existing Markets: An Empirical Study. International Studies in Management and Organization, 7, Winter, 99-122.
Hambrick, D.C.; dan Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
